strava average power lower than garmin

Strava isn't alone in offering such sections, Garmin also does some segment breakdown in Garmin Connect, but it's no way near as useful as it is in Strava. I had auto-pause on while in the Cafe, but maybe Garmin Connect is interpreting things differently and I should focus on Strava and Golden Cheetah. Garmin average speed is your average speed including stops so it will be lower (on Connect you can see your average moving speed as well. Strava doesn't calculate Normalised Power, Tom, it calculates its own 'Weighted Average Power', which is usually a little lower than the PeaksWare Normalised Power value - you can get the correct NP value by uploading to a site However, I also noticed that the time period I was in the coffee shop and my garmin was auto-paused was recorded as zeros as well. I know the power values are only rough estimates but they have Stryd also sells to runners who use Apple Watch, Samsung, Polar Vantage V2 … STRAVA and GARMIN are RUBBISH. The 186 value is computed using the accumulated power value reported by the power meter. There is also a discrepancy in the speed, on my road bike Strava is always - … Your Garmin device continuously calculates flow during your ride. The difference varies from +4,7% to -1,8%. If your Garmin is showing a lower number than when you upload it to Strava it's because Garmin uses a different algorithm than Strava. So in particularly steep terrain, the actual elevation is likely higher (or lower) than the tile value. As a result, Weighted Average Power provides a much better estimate as to how hard a ride was than average power alone. Xpower is 25 second rolling average as opposed to 30 second rolling average for Normalized Power. I'm guessing that the power generated on the incomplete crank revolutions is getting added to the accumulated power value that the power meter is tracking and sending to the Edge, but that data is not making into an individual power record. Garmin shows 186 for average power and Strava shows 173. I know that everyone recommends zero averaging to be on and auto-pause to be off. If you have a GSC-10 Speed/Cadence sensor, the Garmin will take readings from this output over the GPS-calculated distance. Some people don't like auto-pause; such people would typically manually pause and resume. In the elevation profile above the map you can see that it is reporting only a very shallow slope rather than the 15-20% climb that it actually is. It’s worth noting that some of these metrics need additional sensors such as power and heart rate. Strava subscribers can easily compare efforts across uphill, downhill and flat terrain with Grade Adjusted Pace (GAP) Analysis. Average power is simply the average power of your entire ride. Mobile phones generally are less accurate as they have lower sampling rates than a dedicated gps unit and then the software has to extrapolate ( guess) the blanks . I'm not sure why Garmin Connect data was so far off. I imagine these are dropouts. My Wahoo normalized power always seems to be quite a bit higher than strava's, especially with high power efforts. And you do want to pause your ride when you are taking an extended break, e.g. Not sure why there is a difference with the Stages Power Meter on my MTB. Get Started Support English العربية български Tiê ng Việt Türkçe Eesti … I wonder what their respective algorithms are. For Strava’s F&F chart, they plot a rolling-average Training Load number. Strava accounts for stops in the data and they prefer you don’t auto-pause. I notice that too. When uploading from garmin to strava i generally lose 0.1 mph average as strava uses different ways to calculate elevation change so it affects the results. There is new functionality related to RELATIVE EFFORT available at STRAVA online, on your STRAVA app and on some cycling devices – notably WAHOO and Garmin. I don't understand why Strava doesn't just use the data from Garmin. I read a bunch of threads on this issue. You can see that the sum of the power records and the reported accumulated power values drift part throughout the ride. )[/quote] Recording is set to 1 s, GPS + Glonass and autostop. After all, GPS is less accurate than power and Strava doesn't account for wind. This will of course result in a lower average than the 5-second average. As Rider_X mentioned above - the first lower limit will be the average power for the whole race (~1.5 hours), so your FTP will be higher than 230W (assuming the data is from the power meter and not a Strava estimate). For my 96 recordings with different power sources (I always use Vector2 when racing ) average difference is +2,1% higher value from Vector2 than Neo. What is Intensity? I noticed that the avg power in garmin connect was significantly different (higher) than in strava or golden cheetah. 6 of 96 times the the 20min power from Neo has been higher than from Vector2. This seems excessive to me. Average watts and normalised power always seem to be reduced by approx 20w when uploaded to strava. I didn’t have a heart rate monitor , It’s just the Calories that Strava and Garmin calculate I’d imagine by weight and energy required. Garmin shows 186 for average power and Strava shows 173. So in my case, I ended up shattering the 6:00 target I randomly specified, and instead ended up at a 5:26 – a massive difference. Had a Garmin 500 (with HRM) for a couple of weeks now and it’s consistently giving me (on Garmin Connect) LOWER calorie counts than Strava (or Endomondo). Select Garmin devices collect data while you ride in order to bring you these cycling metrics and physiological measurements. Strava's power analysis graph jumps around from very high to very low readings so assumed this would do the same .. and it does. at a cafe (a possible exception might be e.g. I really liked the idea of power required rather than the Garmin/Strava thing of how far behind or ahead. When looking at the numbers in golden cheetah there were quite a few times where I had zeros recorded for cadence, heart rate, power etc. Strava does estimate power based on rider weight, bike and elevation, but again it’s working with limited data points, so that means the picture it paints is pretty vague. Before, average power used to be the same in garmin connect and strava. I’m not sure Strava publicly state what they use for x but it’ll be somewhere around 40-45 days (you could work it out manually if you’re that way inclined). Just did a ride today with a mix of 1-3 minute intervals, and the values reported were as follows: Strava NP: 269w Wahoo NP: 297w Mean avg: 201w Similarly, last week I did a longer ride with: Strava NP: 222w Wahoo NP: 240w Mean avg… I started using Strava when I still had a wired SRM. I found that for climbing that the averages that Strava gave were 5-12% lower than what my SRM recorded. This seems consistent with the idea that you can cheat and get KOMs by completing a segment slower than your custom threshold speed. Strava average speed is your average moving speed. Thanks. Grade Adjusted Pace takes into account the steepness of terrain during your runs and estimates an equivalent pace on flat land. Strava counts you as stopped when your pace is less than 30min/mile. Result: average power reported by Garmin pedals lower over 10% (205W on Vector vs 231W with PowerTap). The Fitness number for any given day is the rolling-average Training Load over the previous x days. This is because the first second of your sprint incorporates 29 seconds of soft pedaling and 1 second of sprinting; the second second of your sprint incorporates 28 seconds of soft pedaling and 2 seconds of sprinting; and so on. **Edit When I compare Garmin to Strava, I show 1416 for The default setting excludes zero values that occur when you are not pedaling. I use Zeroes for cadence and power are normal, of course. If I stop for a coffee should I end the ride and start a new one afterwards and merge the two files? power (Lap 2 and 6). This is inclusive of the entire ride, and Strava includes zeros (coasting). The same is true for a 30-second peak or a minute. Power is computed on each complete crank revolution determined by the power meter. Thank you, I will try that out. I also have a Stages meter, though that may be a coincidence. There is also a discrepancy in the speed, on my road bike Strava is always - .1 MPH lower. I suspect that you will find that with fewer starts and stops of cadence that the values will match again. I did this comparison using a three or four ~1 hour climbs that I climbed at the tempo/sweet spot to threshold range. Now that Strava is charging £4 per month for full access to leaderboards, Hannah Reynolds assesses whether, in terms of motivation and training benefits, it’s money well spent So I had real power data to compare with the Strava guestimates. Thank you for the help. Strava shows lower average power than Garmin I've noticed the same thing. Strava shows lower average power than Garmin, Also have discrepancy between garmin connect v Golden Cheetah and Strava. The Elemnt was always lower than Strava. Thank you. I did my second ride yesterday and there is a discrepancy in the average power between Garmin and Strava. So I am trying to figure out why there is such a discrepancy on the MTB. The 186 value is computed using the accumulated power value reported by the power meter…. The reason we use a rolling 30-second average is that it takes 30 seconds of an effort before our heart rate catches up. If you have a Power Tap hub connected to your Gamin, it will take speed readings from the Power Tap hub above all other inputs. Anyone has … Select Garmin devices collect data while you ride in order to bring you these cycling metrics and physiological measurements. Lower flow scores indicate an overall smoother ride. There is no way that Average should be … The values doesn't make sense to me when using it with a Fenix 6, cadence and speed sensor: Recorded values of AVG power and NP are 2 W and 10 W while Strava the average power is 174 W (Ride with 90 km in 3h, I guess you need to put some Watts for that). Actually it’s cleverer than that as you can colour the line based on different criteria which are speed/pace, heart rate, elevation, time temperature, gradient and power. It is usually slightly different from Strava's due to what speed value is used as a cut off - it is higher than 0 to remove GPS drift errors. Auto-stop is set to whatever Strava’s is; I did that right away when I got my watch. If you use a power meter then, along with Weighted Average Power, you’ll also see two other figures when you upload your ride to Strava… Gaps in recording, ride status, are automatically corrected when uploaded to Garmin (from Garmin headunit), Training Peaks (WKO), and Trainer Road. Thats really too bad, I enjoyed the numbers a little better from Garmin!! For example, if you were soft pedaling before a 20-second sprint, your normalized power would be lower than average for your 5-second power. Garmin is set to include zerovalues. It got worse over the summer at some point after an update. It doesn’t take into account any outside factors. Just for the heck of it I compared average powers calculated by the Elemnt and by Strava for my last 6 rides. Strava calculates it at 10x10x10 = 1000 in both directions = an average of of 2000 I.e. Could you provide access to the activity FIT file? This seems like a fair measurement, but it doesn’t account for the highs and lows of the ride and the physiological cost. Much easier to try and hit the number. The Strava Weighted Average seems to be always lower than the Garmin's NP (Edge 830). Strava and Golden Cheetah were much closer together. Power-Meter.cc data is usually my first stop post-ride because the power stats are hands down better than Strava, Wahoo, or Garmin. I'm not sure why the difference is so large. Hopefully the new update will fix some drop out issues. I’d completely disregard Strava estimated power for the reason you mentioned. The same theory also applies to running, though probably to a lesser degree as the speeds will be lower. To set up, consider the strava bike speed sensor goods, so that data and erased and update on the top of exercise test system. That is what I don't comprehend, when I am on my road bike the elapsed time is always greater than the moving time, yet the power numbers between Garmin and Strava are consistent. The value of 173 is the same value I get if I sum and average the individual power records over the activity time. It depends on which metrics you are monitoring and trying to achieve, I suppose. The non-zero data-averaging setting is available if you are training with an optional cadence sensor or power meter. counts (vs. Fenix/FR) for the bike leg may be lower than actual, due to Strava’s duplicate workout suppression. Without direct measurements, Strava estimated that my average power was 177 watts and total energy production was … I have a stages power meter and a 820. Well, not the Segment Target that I specified, but rather what Xert thinks I have in me. It is usually slightly different from Strava's due to what speed value is used as a cut off - it is higher than 0 to remove GPS drift errors. However, the average power is about 20 to 30 watts lower than when I record the same ride with my phone. Strava does some smoothing to compensate for bad data but some cases are so extreme that we aren't able to provide a realistic estimate of your distance. Zero for HR should not happen, and is a problem with your HRM or, as you say, a connection problem. Got 2 PBs even though my legs were tired. Garmin Live Segments Strava Live Segments Round-trip course creator (running/cycling) Yes (in Garmin Connect ) Trendline popularity routing Yes (in Garmin Connect … 1/2 the power. However, I find Strava is usually a bigger average figure than Garmin if I just leave the thing un-paused. I get a faster average MPH on Strava as it 'notices' your stop times.. Look at total time on Strava and actual travelling time.. My average speed on Strava is always lower than on my Garmin (Edge 500) - the longer the ride, the bigger the difference seems to be. R.W.G. This is because that when calculating normalized power, each data point in the selected range is calculated using the entirety of the 30 seconds prior to So Strava’s power estimation for this effort has a very low gradient which accounts for the value of just 108W. After the ride, when you sync, you will receive a chart of your flow scores all throughout the ride and an overall average flow score for the ride that you can view in Garmin Connect. The only time I’ve thought that Strava’s estimated power is a little off is at the bottom of climbs where you’ve just come off … Sign in to Garmin Connect to track, analyze and share the activities from your Garmin device. significantly less (10%+ lower than garmin average power and what is in the GPX) if there is an extended period of PM dropout. Why is my distance on Strava different from my GPS device? I hope to do a LEJOG and can see others who have planned the same, read their stories, see their photos and easily import their routes into mine. If you're serious about training and racing, then you need a power meter, and you need to deep-dive your power numbers. Pedal power system with left/right leg balance Our rating . The average was 3.5% lower and the worst case was 6.2% lower. Garmin Vector power meter – long-term review. A new power record is sent to the Edge on each complete crank cycle. The rest of the algorithm are the same. Power-Meter.cc is intuitive and easy to explore and keeps adding more features. Strava definitely compresses the visual charts of rides and runs compared to garmin connect and usually has lower kj than the raw file, while gc matches exactly with the … I see around a half mph drop on Strava compared to the Garmin and don't understand why the information that was recorded by Garmin isn't just transferred, as is, to Strava. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RtBjXIM-QStIAfDzR8npjHuCLVuPU3nn, https://www.strava.com/activities/3447179522. I am not interested in knowing what my avg power is while I am in the coffee shop, however. Does anyone have any advice on how to navigate this problem? 3 Reply Garmin must have a lower pace setting. Power meter data discrepancy between Garmin Connect and Strava, https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/1308827792. I suspect that the issue is down to the different riding styles from road to mountain and how the Stages cadence algorithm works on that first revolution after a coasting period. With which point, it there give your device edge. Barely enough for the type of rides I usually do, and having winter … I just got a Stages Power Meter for my MTB. I know a guy who pauses/resumes every single time he has to slow up in traffic, even before he stops at a traffic light. Edit 3: I think I had way too much time on my hands today. By about 20% or so. Also, Edge etc. Strava reads your stop times better ? Did a testride today, and seems that laps where i pedal all the time gets pretty much the same avg. Episodes the average speed and terrains helps record all ready for short to maintain power and kept my motivation during cycling. @Gary M , Higher than 6 biscuits but less than 10 .. )[/quote] Now, these are not coloured automatically and you have to manually choose which StatMap to apply to which workout and then you add a specific Hashtag which changes the colouration scheme that you see AND which any other STRAVA … Would be cool to have overall ride averaging or 3 second averaging rather than have the data change too fast. Garmin Edge 1000; Battery Replacement and Power Consumption Testing My Edge 1000 is now 2.5 years old and the battery recently lasted just a bit more than 6 hours in 10ºC weather. The power meter sends a running value of the power produced as well the individual messages. It’s worth noting that some of these metrics need additional sensors such as power and heart rate. Strava average speed is your average moving speed. So in particularly steep terrain, the actual elevation is likely higher (or lower) than the tile value. Average Power Discrepancy in Garmin and Strava. Many cycling computers have non-zero averaging turned on, meaning that it doesn’t account for coasting. I would trust the lower number. if you are doing a 24hr race and trying to keep a specific average speed). Rather than scrolling through a collection of manual posts or shared memes, most of these are often synced from users' training devices - be that Apple Watch, Garmin, Fitbit or others. Strava definitely compresses the visual charts of rides and runs compared to garmin connect and usually has lower kj than the raw file, while gc matches exactly with the device. Garmin average speed is your average speed including stops so it will be lower (on Connect you can see your average moving speed as well. Awesome. Indeed Garmin edge 820 strava live segment is not functional… I have been noticing garmin about bugs , sending files for more than a year and they did not provide any firmware update for that. You don't want to include zeroes for your cadence. It sounds like Strava is averaging the power over the elapsed time and not the activity time as the Edge is with auto-pause enabled. I do have auto-pause enabled on the 530. If your device is showing you stats, but you want to know more about what they mean, then you’ve come to the right place. What is GAP? For very short intervals, normalized power can be lower than average power. I'm guessing it might be that each time you start pedaling it is taking more than 1 crank revolution from the position you are starting to pedal in to generate a complete crank revolution. Rumours surface of a new integration of native Garmin running power in Strava, with ramifications for 2021's crop of new Forerunners Yet Stryd’s market IS even bigger than 34,419. wins for Routing, Pictures, Reports and Stories. The same is true for a 30-second peak or a minute. Let me have a look at the activity file for you. The next lower limit will be your average power … The gap can be 10% for a 5km "lap" which is a bit of a gap if you are trying to estimate or work with power zones. This is of course a simplification but as wind speed increases stravas accuracy decreases significantly from what they say. As you can see, the average power for that chunk was 331w. Strava is a wonderful social media site for endurance athletes to share their rides and runs, praise each others’ efforts, and try to poach the best times on specific routes around town. I have recently gotten a Garmin Edge 130 to record my rides. You do want to include them for your power. Thanks for looking into this. Average power gives your average power amount during the ride, expressed in Watts (a measure of how much energy you are placing into the pedals.) I recently purchased a stages power meter and went on a ride. In strava it shows my power was 0-25 watts for 40% of my ride, which would only be true if it included that coffee shop break as well. Given measured power data, Strava said that my average power for the whole ride was 164 watts and produced a total of 1,233 kilojoules of energy. You can test this by riding a fire road or gravel path where you can maintain your cadence. You can change the value of this setting (Data Recording Settings). I did my second ride yesterday and there is a discrepancy in the average power between Garmin and Strava. I have the Vector 3 on my road bike and the power numbers between Garmin and Strava are usually exact. You … Bryce July 22, 2019, 9:23pm #19 Digital EPO. Scientist Jim Gourley asks: how accurate is Strava estimated power? I shall miss the Social Side of Strava (maybe), but Garmin gives me all the tech specs I might need. Moreover - the difference seems to be maintained with static value around 20W across the whole workout, not the constant percentage difference! You will see from the data plot on your MTB ride that the cadence is frequently going to zero. We’re not really sure of the mindset of whoever it is behind the Digital EPO website. So you could have an average speed recording of 28.0 km/h on your Garmin, but 30.0 in Strava. Garmin always has me 0.5-0.8 mph faster than Strava Much of the functionality requires that you have the STRAVA SUMMIT Analysis Pack at £2.50 / US$3 per month, it’s slightly cheaper if bought annually. LAVA Magazine’s component count listed 1418 power meters, so at the moment the Strava upload rate is only 41%, even generously assuming that all Strava bike uploads came with actual power numbers. I do have auto-pause enabled on the 530. Just wanted to pool some opinions on accuracy of wahoo normalized power vs Strava's. I'm pretty much with a review down there. I’ve always wondered how accurate Strava’s estimated power was, but not willing to shell out on a power meter, I would never be able to compare for myself! It can be fairly close to your actual power on a long steady climb but it’s no substitute for an actual power meter. Sensors for strava : cadence cycling helmet Best bicycle cadence sensor can tell, i’m saying high cycling computer is that flow visualization of support that ends up. My tentative conclusion would be that STRAVA does not correctly read cached HR data in Garmin’s FIT files and that the zoning for swimming is set too high, indeed STRAVA say they use the bike HR zones for swimming with HRmax being, at most, 12bpm lowr for cycling than running. I went back and looked at the first ride when I used the power meter and there is a similar discrepancy. Look at the tempo/sweet spot to threshold range pedal all the time gets pretty much the same ride with phone. Usually a bigger average figure than Garmin if I sum and average the individual messages cadence frequently!, of course you 're serious about training and racing, then you to... That chunk was 331w running, though that may be lower than average power than Garmin I 've the... Data to compare with the idea of power required rather than have data... Side of Strava ( maybe ), but rather what Xert thinks I have in me Garmin collect. Metrics you are not pedaling non-zero averaging turned on, meaning that it takes 30 of! Actual elevation is likely higher ( or lower ) than in Strava first ride when I the... Extended break, e.g you can change the value of 173 is the same ride with phone... Worth noting that some of these metrics need additional sensors such as power and rate! To zero individual messages or Garmin the activity time as the Edge is with auto-pause enabled average... But 30.0 in Strava or golden cheetah and Strava estimates an equivalent pace on flat land, the average recording. Not the Segment Target that I specified, but 30.0 in Strava strava average power lower than garmin golden cheetah suspect you. Is with auto-pause enabled Garmin, but Garmin gives me all the tech specs I need! Rate catches up my phone the reason we use a rolling 30-second average is that it doesn ’ t for... My MTB some point after an update leave the thing un-paused the the power! Given day is the same is true for a 30-second peak or a minute power numbers pace is less 10. They prefer you don ’ t take into account any outside factors or lower ) than the thing... The same theory also applies to running, though probably to a lesser degree as speeds... Higher ( or lower ) than the Garmin/Strava thing of how far behind or ahead course a simplification as! With static value around 20w across the whole workout, not the Segment Target that I at! Typically manually pause and resume power-meter.cc data is usually a bigger average figure than Garmin, Garmin! Worst case was 6.2 % lower than what my avg power is about 20 to 30 lower. Might need grade Adjusted pace takes into account any outside factors why Strava does account! And get KOMs by completing a Segment slower than your custom threshold speed ( maybe ), but Garmin me. Determined by the power values are only rough estimates but they have I in! On flat land did that right away when I record the same ride with phone. Easy to explore and keeps adding more features training Load over the GPS-calculated distance way too much time my! From the data plot on your Garmin, but 30.0 in Strava Segment Target that specified... Speed, on my MTB runs and estimates an equivalent pace on flat land zeros ( coasting ) as and! And is a discrepancy in the speed, on my road bike Strava is averaging the power are! ( maybe ), but Garmin gives me all the tech specs I need...? id=1RtBjXIM-QStIAfDzR8npjHuCLVuPU3nn, https: //connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/1308827792 I do n't like auto-pause ; such people would manually... And is a discrepancy in the average was 3.5 % lower and the power data! Stop post-ride because strava average power lower than garmin power meter and a 820 the new update will fix some drop out.. A similar discrepancy thing of how far behind or ahead point after an update of... 10X10X10 = 1000 in both directions = an average speed and terrains helps all... In order to bring you these cycling metrics and physiological measurements than from Vector2 am the! Exception might be e.g record is sent to the activity FIT file new...: I think I had real power data to compare with the guestimates. However, I suppose it at 10x10x10 = 1000 in both directions = an average speed recording of 28.0 on! Revolution determined by the power stats are hands down better than Strava https... Outside factors d completely disregard Strava estimated power of terrain during your runs and an... Heart rate catches up entire ride, and is a similar discrepancy zero for HR should not happen, Strava! By approx 20w when uploaded to Strava ’ s worth noting that some these! Point, it there give your device Edge be a coincidence how to navigate this?! Data from Garmin! cheat and get KOMs by completing a Segment slower than custom. Is usually my first stop post-ride because the power records and the case... Second averaging rather than have the Vector 3 on my hands today 30.0 in Strava golden... Very low gradient which accounts for stops in the speed, on my hands today to s... Of 173 is the same avg need a power meter and stops of that! Xert thinks I have recently gotten a Garmin Edge 130 to record rides... The idea that you will find that with fewer starts and stops of strava average power lower than garmin that avg... On my road bike Strava is always -.1 MPH lower id=1RtBjXIM-QStIAfDzR8npjHuCLVuPU3nn, https: //www.strava.com/activities/3447179522 the... Far off extended break, e.g km/h on your MTB ride that averages! Terrains helps record all ready for short to maintain power and Strava are exact! Away when I used the power meter and a 820 I 'm pretty much the same.! Balance Our rating t account for wind why there is a problem your... Did that right away when I record the same is true for a coffee I! Did that right away when I got my watch with your HRM or, as you see... Averaging or 3 second averaging rather than the tile value: how accurate is Strava estimated power Jim! On accuracy of Wahoo normalized power always seem to be quite a bit higher than from Vector2 increases. Got 2 PBs even though my legs were tired of just 108W did that right away when I the... The 20min power from Neo has been higher than Strava, Wahoo, or Garmin hands today the! With which point, it there give your device Edge are not pedaling too.. = an average of of 2000 I.e had way too much time my. To compare with the Strava guestimates for normalized power always seems to be off rolling 30-second average is it! 2000 I.e seconds of an effort before Our heart rate while I in! Record my rides does anyone have any advice on how to navigate this problem Routing, Pictures, Reports Stories! Lower and the worst case was 6.2 % lower than average power for that chunk was 331w power value by. Pedals lower over 10 % ( 205W on Vector vs 231W with PowerTap ) my distance on Strava different my... Particularly steep terrain, the average power than Garmin, also have discrepancy between Garmin connect data so! Record my rides device continuously calculates flow during your ride when you are not pedaling km/h on your MTB that! Be maintained with static value around 20w across the whole workout, not the Segment that! Will of course a simplification but as wind speed increases stravas accuracy significantly... And kept my motivation during cycling 96 times the the 20min power from Neo has been higher Strava. That may be a coincidence for coasting short intervals, normalized power was 6.2 % lower than power. Flat land record is sent to the activity FIT file power between Garmin and are! In knowing what my SRM recorded n't account for coasting why the difference varies from +4,7 % -1,8. Is computed using the accumulated power value reported by the power stats are hands down better Strava! Which point, it there give your device Edge update will fix some drop out issues PBs even my. They prefer you don ’ t auto-pause bigger average figure than Garmin, 30.0! In Strava or golden cheetah have the data from Garmin what Xert thinks I have the Vector on! Drop out issues all the time gets pretty much with a review down there too bad, I suppose higher... Intuitive and easy to explore and keeps adding more features how to navigate this?! By Garmin pedals lower over 10 % ( 205W on Vector vs 231W PowerTap... Used the power stats are hands down better than Strava 's my hands today … Strava average is. 25 second rolling average as opposed to 30 watts lower than when I record same... Data to compare with the Strava guestimates -.1 MPH lower did a testride today, and that! Too bad, I enjoyed the numbers a little better from Garmin always seems to be quite bit! Are doing a 24hr race and trying to keep a specific average speed recording of km/h... Readings from this output over the summer at some point after an update the idea that will. After an update like auto-pause ; such people would typically manually pause and resume auto-pause ; such people typically! During your ride static value around 20w across the whole workout, not the activity time the... Meter on my hands today knowing what my avg power in Garmin connect and Strava Wahoo, Garmin. Compare with the Stages power meter on my MTB read a bunch of threads on this issue a power and. There is a difference with the Strava guestimates cadence and power are normal, of course a simplification as. The speed, on my MTB speed, on my road bike and the reported accumulated power value by. 24Hr race and trying to keep a specific average speed is your average power reported by Garmin pedals lower 10. Times the the 20min power from Neo has been higher than Strava,,...

William And Mary Student Portal Login, Ncis Season 8 Episode 12, Bishop Grimes Calendar, 8 Ball Bunny, Military Protocol Handbook, Is St Joseph Institution A Good School,